Few days ago Iran’s Secretary of Expediency Council Mohsen Rezaei registered his candidacy for the upcoming presidential elections,

I will find the missing oil money and return it to you, the people of Iran. I do not seek revenge, but I will not shut my eyes to what happens to public funds,” Rezaei told an audience at the Shahid Chamran university in the southern city of Ahvaz in Khuzestan.

This is actually exactly what Ahmadinejad said on his campaign four years ago. Just to let you know that Ahmadinejad announced few days ago that most of the cases has been investigated and will be announced if he win the election again.

I just wonder why who ever wants to become President in Iran claimes that he would do the Justice ministry’s job instead of running the country.

“Many cases of financial fraud can be traced back to the country’s disorderly bureaucratic structure, which I intend to modify with special measures and electronic systems,” added Rezaei, who is himself from Khuzestan.

He was referring to the mystery surrounding a $1 billion shortfall in the country’s oil revenues.

I should say here that he already has the power to investigate the matter or bringing the case up as the Secretary of Expediency Council but he prefers to become the President of the country and get paid enough to do so!!

He also commented on President Ahmadinejad on his Press conference:

“The truth is that our nation has two very different paths at hand. If President Ahmadinejad gets his way, we will fall off the cliff … we will be defeated,”

A former commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC), Rezaei ran in the 2005 presidential election but pulled out of the race a day before the vote which saw President Ahmadinejad sweeping to victory with nearly 62 percent of the ballot.

“Ahmadinejad could only be a sheriff or mayor and nothing more” he announced when he was asked if he would be using Ahmadinejad in any post.

Registering Rezaee as a candidate is again a strategy to split the vote against Ahmadinejad a tactic that worked against reformers on the last election. Though he claimes that he is an independent candidate but his candidacy was welcomed by some of the Revolutionary Guards Corps.  

Yesterday’s speech by Ahmadinejad

on the Racism and calling Israel and the Zionism government as RACISM, gave a huge media attention to Ahmadinejad, a good victory for him on the last few month of his presidency of Iran. It is quite obvious  that Ahmadinejad is the most loved politician by the Moslem and Arab nations, while all Arab leaders and politicians are keeping smile on their face towards Israel, Ahmadinejad is becoming the spokesman of the people in Middle East.

During my stay in Saudi Arabia I spoke many people, of course all Moslems from all over the world. it was clear that he is the one that people would vote for as a negotiator with West.

I was speaking to a group of young guys who were a big fan of Ahmadinejad, believing that he is the one who knows how to talk to Bush and hi is a great politician, when I raised the economical problems and the effects of sanctions on Iran the answer was:

Not having sanction in other Arab and Moslem countries dose not make big deferens on the wide gap between the poor and riches in those countries. There are many poor people in Saudi, Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Morocco, Pakistan, India, and many others. and if you see countries like Kuwait, UAE, Qatar and Oman, it is because for the amount of oil they sale and the population they have they are not even as reach as they have to be.

So what is the point of listening to west?

Ahmadinejad has reopened the Iranian nuclear centres and speed up the process of developing the nuclear energy. A research that Khatami stopped to build up trust with the west, it was stopped for two years and in return Iran got nominated and then choosen as an Axis of Evil.

Well, what do you think?

We have all heard the news about the racism conference 2009 and Ahmadinejad’s speech in that conference we have also seen the footages of the conference during Ahmadinejad’s speech or you can watch it on YouTube.

As the stile of this blog is becoming more asking questions let ask some question form ourselves before all Media monopolies get in to us. 

1.    Why even before the conference some countries boycotted the conference?

2.     Why right at the beginning of the conference some wore clown wigs attacked Ahmadinejad and how did he manage to get that close to the podium?

3.      Who was the second protester, how he was positioned among the delegates and who authorized him as a member of this conference?

4.     Why some of the EU countries left the conference and how did they make the decision with in a second all together?

5.     Why Bon Ki Moon immediately  showed reaction towards Ahmadinejad’s speech?

6.     Is the UN Indipendent?

7.     Is the world safe?

8.     After all, Who was the winner and made the point?

There is a slang in Persian:  AS SOON AS YOU PICKUP THE BATON THE THIEF WILL RUN AWAY HIMSELF.

I would like to bring one of the Guardian’s Articles over the event;

Britain walks out of conference as Ahmadinejad calls Israel ‘racist’

Dozens of diplomats, including Britain’s UN ambassador in Geneva, walked out of a speech by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad this afternoon when the Iranian president accused Israel of being “a totally racist” regime.

The address at a UN conference on racism in Geneva was disrupted by protesters who heckled Ahmadinejad after he branded Israel a “cruel and oppressive racist regime”. He said the state of Israel was created “on the pretext of Jewish suffering” from the second world war.

Peter Gooderham, the UK ambassador to the UN in Geneva, walked out along with representatives from France, Spain and several other European countries. One shook his fist at the Iranian president as he left. The delegates said they planned to return to the session as soon as Ahmadinejad had finished speaking.

European countries had been split over whether to attend amid fears Ahmadinejad and other delegates could ignite a new row over the Holocaust or Israel’s right to exist.

Germany, Poland and the Netherlands were joining a boycott led by the US and Israel. France and Britain attended but promised to walk out of the conference if offensive language was used at the podium.

The protesters leapt to their feet and shouted “racist” in French at Ahmadinejad when he made his remarks about the state of Israel.

Some wore clown wigs and one, who was positioned among the delegates, managed to run to within 10 yards of the Iranian president before throwing a soft red object, hitting the podium and interrupting his speech. The protester was ushered out by security.

All these protests happened right at the beginning of Ahmadinejads speech not when he mentioned Israel.

The protesters said they represented the Union of Jewish Students in France. “We did it because it’s all a farce,” Joelle Jakubowicz said. “You can’t fight racism if you are racist yourself.”

www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/apr/20/un-conference-boycott-ahmadinejad

Presidential election will take place in Iran on 12th June. No doubts that the main aim for all major parties in Iran is to avoid the split of the votes. Some thing that has happened on the last election and the result was the victory of Ahmadinejad. That’s why that the Iranian reform movement is attempting to unite behind a single candidate as the former President Mohammad Khatami left the race and endorsed Former Prim Minister Mir Hossein Mousavi another Reformist candidate.

I would ask this question from my self that would he be able to repeat his victory again if he would not step down?!! Never mine, He is also trying hard to persuade Karroubi to withdraw his candidacy in favor of Mir Hussien Mousavi, some thing that still hasn’t happened and I doubt that Karroubi would ever withdraw in favor of any one except his wife who is not able to become a candidate as until now the Council of Guardians has never authorised women to become candidate for the presidency.

Also the Conservative alliances are still negotiating to agree on a single candidate.

There is one question here; would the conservatives be able fined a better option than Mousavi?

If the aim is to win over Ahmadinejad which it is! And there are no major differences between both reformists and the conservatives in Iran, so why would the conservatives announce their own candidate?

Few month ago Natheghe Noori who was the conservative candidate running for the post against Khatami on 1997 offered talks with all parties except the Conservative principalists Socialists!!!!  (That’s what i would use for Ahmadinejad ) to negotiate to agree on a single candidate and a single party (The National Union Party) which was a very clever move by him.

Why?

Results of the past few elections show that the Iranians would not easily vote for the reformists as they did on 1997 any more. Also one of the reasons that Ahmadinejad won the 2005’s election was because on the run-off he was standing against Rafsanjani.

Lets do not forget that in the firs round Ahmadinejad got only 19.48% of the votes and in the run-off 61.69%. I really don’t believe that wining the election against Rafsanjani would be a big challenge.

Lets go back a bit and have a look at the parliamentary Election In 2000, in the first election after the end of his presidency, Rafsanjani ran again for Parliament but was not among the 30 representatives of Tehran elected, as announced by the Iranian Ministry of the Interior. The Council of Guardians then ruled numerous ballots void and were able to get him elected as the 30th representative. Rafsanjani thus became a Member of Parliament once more, but resigned before being sworn in as an MP. He explained that he felt he was “able to serve the people better in other posts”.

To be continued……

Every one has a way of thinking, seeing, looking and saying.

There are some people who never want others to know what they think how they see and look.

There are some people who want everyone to know how they sees, look and think but don’t know how.

There are some people who were told not to announce their opinion.

There are some people who are used to keep their opinions inside.

There are some people who have never been allowed to talk about their opinions.

There are some people who are scared to announce their opinions.

There are some people who are too shy to talk about their opinions.

There are some people who think there is no point to say their opinions.

There are some people who have been laughed at when they told others their opinions and never did that again.

you know what?

I just think now is the time for every one to say their every single opinion about every single thing.

It’s a time to share and discuss the views, not just with those who are friend and known, even with those who we don’t know or don’t like them.

It’s a time to talk and discuss.

I am writing to voice my opinion on every thing.

Sorry if you may think they are rubbish.

At least you may think abut what i say.

And I need to know what you think about my thought.

So, Please comment on them.

Thank You.